"Kindly bear with me as I am neither a good writer nor editor to place my points in sequence."
Well Here I am on my point, One fine day I thought Why Mr. Raj is shouting against all Non Marathis, the obvious reason is that when outsiders are working and earning in Mumbai then where will Marathis go to earn there bread.
Well all say "Take everything positively" but has anyone taken time to realise what is the main reason behind this frequently raised issues. I am in no position to support MNS or Shivsena for what they say against North Indians but what I feel is instead of Media asking questions to MNS or Shivsena for thre rude behavior, its time Media should question the CM's of other respective states as where and why is there respective state lacking behind to provide job for there people. If all Ministers starts work efficiently and starts developing there states then its obvious that big companies are bound to get attracted to open their branches in your state (e.g., How Tata took his Nano project to Gujrat). Critics would say industries can be established only where proper mineral resources is available (e.g., Steel Plant can be in Jharkand only and not in J&K, Gas plant can be in Coastal area and not in Patna), so my question to them is if such minerals based manufacturing industries are excluded from our list why cant the states infrastructure be made strong enough to attract IT giants like Infosys, Wipro, RIM etc who are into software field to open there branches to create employment of your people.
Same way in terms of Education,in my list Karnataka is anytime better then any other state.
Why cant Govt do well enough to open good schools and colleges to provide enough seats for there students which would help in stop migration from one state to other.
Before commenting on other's speech the Ministers should look into themselves where and why they are lacking. Each student or person migrating to other state for the need of Education/ Earning should be considered as lack of the State govt for not able to fulfill there requirements.
When a contractor is punished or charged penalty for not completing his given project(roads, bridges) on time, then why should the whole Cabinet or Govt is not liable to be punished when they fail to reach the targets at the end of there 5years term.
I 've expressed my views here solely on the basis of what I feel and not influenced by any person in general.
Your views and comments are welcomed.Please do take time to scribble down your comments.
Regards:
"Gunj"